Disinformation, hyper-partisanship and the limits of regulation
Eurozine podcast pt. 1: The changing face of the media
Listen to “Eurozine podcast part I: The changing face of the media” on Spreaker.
Disinformation, hate speech and hyper-partisanship pose an increasing challenge to the democratic functioning of our public spheres. Developments suggest a new readiness for regulation on the part of governments, publics and companies themselves. But does regulation set a new set of traps for free speech and media diversity? Moreover, is it even adequate to the problems facing the public sphere? Or do we need to be asking more fundamental questions about how the media are structured?
In the first instalment of the Eurozine special edition podcasts, produced by Talk Eastern Europe, Eurozine’s senior editor Simon Garnett talks with Claire Potter, author of the book Political Junkies: From Talk Radio to Twitter, How Alternative Media Hooked Us on Politics and Broke Our Democracy and editor of Public Seminar (US), and Daniel Leisegang, editor of Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik (Germany).
The podcast was recorded in November 2019 at the 30th European Meeting of Cultural Journals.
Find the second part of the special edition podcasts here:
Published 18 February 2020
Original in English
Hot off the press
The new Eurozine anthology on 1989 and the thirty years since
Want to hear a human voice?
Listen and subscribe wherever you get your
podcasts.
Newsletter
Subscribe to know what’s worth thinking about.
Related Articles
The truth about MH17
An interview with Bellingcat founder Eliot Higgins
And we dream as electric sheep
On humanity, sexuality and digitality
Related Articles
The term ‘hybrid war’ has become synonymous with Russian aggression. It denotes a style of warfare that combines the political, economic, social and kinetic, in a kind of conflict that recognizes no boundaries between covert and overt war. However, this definition fails to recognize crucial distinctions in Russian strategy, writes Mark Galeotti.
Data-driven political marketing and electoral hacking follow a similar principle: focus on the weakest link, whether susceptible individuals or voting machines in swing states. On what the Cambridge Analytica scandal reveals about the new arts of political campaigning.