What binds and divides
New Eastern Europe 6/2020
- Eurozine Review
Understanding values in uncertain times: ‘New Eastern Europe’ on what has happened to Ukraine’s pro-western alliance; how female soft-power has moved centre-stage in Belarus; and why most Hungarians still support a neoliberal xenophobe.
In Ukraine, ‘politics is still not driven by ideas or ideologies, but by personalities and money’, according to philosopher Volodymyr Yermolenko. The party of Volodymyr Zelensky, Servant of the People, conceals emptiness under a cloak of inclusiveness, while pro-western political forces are being undermined by a huge disinformation campaign.
At the heart of the problem is the break-up of the alliance that emerged in opposition to Soviet totalitarianism combining ‘the liberal discourse on human rights and the patriotic values of community rights and identity’. The driving force of Euromaidan has started giving way to a radicalization of opposing discourses whose ‘zoopolitical ethos’ aims to destroy all adversaries.
Women up front
The three female leaders of the Belarusian opposition – Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, Maria Kalesnikava and Veranika Tsapkala – ‘were, in a certain way, representing three non-registered male presidential candidates’, writes Olga Dryndova. But their alliance received an overwhelming consensus because ‘their self-image and public statements combined messages of traditional values and female leadership’.
In the aftermath of the election, women were once again front stage, protesting against police violence and repression. In grassroots initiatives, women ‘were not only led by women politicians, but started to self-organize for political purposes’, giving rise to a new female ‘soft-power’.
Despite having held an illiberal supermajority for a decade, Fidesz still secures over 40 per cent of the vote in national elections. Do Hungarians approve of Orbán’s authoritarianism and textbook neoliberalism? Not so much the latter, it would seem: ‘the public preference in economic matters is overwhelmingly social democratic’, writes Eurozine editor in chief Réka Kinga Papp.
What probably keeps Fidesz in power is widespread xenophobia and racism. While some of Orbán’s opponents believe Hungarians are incapable of overcoming the historical baggage of authoritarianism, ‘it is worth remembering that political trajectories do not follow pre-drawn patterns’: the struggle for a fairer society is still very much alive.
Réka Kinga Papp discussed ‘Hungarian values and how to misunderstand them’ together with other contributors to the issue in a live stream moderated by NEE editor-in-chief Adam Reichardt on 3 December 2020.
This article is part of the 21/2020 Eurozine review. Click here to subscribe to our weekly newsletter to get updates on reviews and our latest publishing.
Published 2 December 2020
Original in English
First published by Eurozine
Contributed by New Eastern Europe © EurozinePDF/PRINT
Ukrainians should have known that war would be the ultimate consequence of their identification with the West. Now that Russia has carried out its longstanding threat, the reality has dawned. But can the same be said for Europe?
Reintegrating Russian-speaking Ukrainians into the ‘Motherland’ – one of Putin’s central pretexts for war – has impacted a sharp counter reaction: many are abandoning their mother tongue, reaffirming their Ukrainian identity. Could Ukraine be headed for monolingualism after centuries of multi-language cultural exchange?