Semblance of normality
Wespennest 180 (2021)
- Eurozine Review
‘Wespennest’ contemplates normality in its various guises: how can abnormal behaviour have become acceptable; what lies behind the ‘new normal’ and flattening coronavirus-induced curves; and whether the aspiration of a newly equitable norm is just wishful thinking.
As Elizabeth Stephens points out, ‘normal’ is now a flexible and even contradictory term. Following the 2016 elections in the US, for example, calls by those on the political left for a return to normal seemed at odds with longstanding critiques of normativity. Concurrently, the process of ‘normalization’ saw previously abnormal or morally aberrant behaviour becoming increasingly acceptable. As Stephens writes, ‘Where previously the “normalisation” had been primarily used to refer to the process of making something more normal, in 2016, it was overwhelmingly used to refer to the process of making the abnormal seem widely acceptable’.
The 2019 bushfires in Australia signalled a ‘new normal’ according to Prime Minister Scott Morrison, while the pandemic has left many wanting to ‘return to normal’. Rather than returning to political, economic and ecological systems of exploitation, Stephens suggests, the normality of the past might be better exchanged for a re-imagined, albeit uncertain, future.
Flattening the curve
During the pandemic, government ministers and scientists have often visually represented normality in the form of graphs and charts. ‘Flatten the curve’ and we can all return to our normal lives – or some semblance of them– so the story goes. Within this brave new world of corona-induced normality, ‘curve landscapes’ have become an instrument of power. ‘The instances shown may be as different as hospital beds and ski slopes,’ writes Jürgen Link, ‘but the media shows us a statistical curve,’ which ‘inspires confidence because it was fabricated by scientific experts.’ Link argues that these indicators of truth are rarely questioned, suggesting a ‘new normal’ based on comforting arcs that are coupled and grouped into symbolic visualizations of our present reality.
Business as usual
With governments increasing public spending and borrowing to offset the impacts of the pandemic, some have envisioned a more equitable future. However, the exact nature and specifics of corona relief packages can be described as anything but transparent. Governments are dispensing public money in a hierarchical manner that further entrenches inequality rather than alleviating it.
According to Martin Schürz, the ongoing, pandemic-related tension between public aid and private profits could have more fairly reallocated wealth, but it has merely resulted in business as usual. As Schürz points out, ‘Whoever was dreaming of a revitalized welfare state … should look at data on wealth concentration. Billionaires have become more than US$1 trillion richer during the COVID crisis’ – a new normal that looks curiously familiar.
This article is part of the 9/2021 Eurozine review. Click here to subscribe to our weekly newsletter to get updates on reviews and our latest publishing.
Published 26 May 2021
Original in English
First published by Eurozine
Italy’s enthusiasm for Chinese investment has recently cooled, as transatlanticism, security risks and domestic resentment become decisive factors. The Italian change of heart is shared by the EU, which is finally developing a coordinated and values-based response to Chinese economic activity in the bloc.
‘Esprit’ addresses the growing coronavirus-provoked ‘epidemic of fatigue’, including: the underestimated mental health impacts on society at large, and youth in particular; a historical overview of exhaustion; and lessons for post-COVID economic recovery drawn from post-war France.