Remaking the world

Soundings 75/2020

In ‘Soundings’, a reappraisal of the liberal narrative of decolonization; why the Sinn Féin shock may not have been a victory for the left; whether Brexit will inevitably lead to US-style deregulation; and the roots of Brazil’s synthetic totalitarianism.

In Soundings, historian Adom Getachew argues that the liberal narrative of decolonization as progressive expansion of an international society overlooks the revolutionary roots of the anti-colonial project. ‘Supporters of decolonization have always sought to create something much more than nationalisms’, seeking instead an alternative global system that remakes the world and transforms relations of hierarchy.

The task today, Getachew says, is ‘to think about how you might connect struggles, and how you might actually build bridges of exchange and solidarity that facilitate this way of thinking at both the domestic and the international level’.


Colin Coulter questions the ‘Sinn Féin shock wave’ in February. More than anything else, Sinn Féin’s success indicates the shift in Irish politics since the global financial crisis. ‘The seemingly overnight success of the party was, in fact, at least a dozen years in the making.’

Was Sinn Féin’s resurgence even a victory for the left? ‘While Sinn Féin is a party that contains many socialists, it is not in fact a socialist party.’ When push comes to shove, argues Coulter, the call for a fairer society will always be relegated to the national question. In the North, the party has forwarded the DUP’s neoliberal policies, while its response to progressive popular movements in the south – for example the campaign to repeal the eighth amendment of the Irish constitution that outlawed abortion – has often been ‘equivocal’.

During the health crisis, Sinn Féin has continued to prioritize republican goals, arguing that north-south co-operation would accelerate the transition to a united Ireland. The irony is that, in doing so, it may have ‘helped prepare the ground for the restoration of Ireland’s political status quo’.


Nick Dearden asks whether Brexit will inevitably lead to ‘US-style deregulation’. This is, at least, what the free market ‘Atlanticists’ in the British cabinet hope. But there is opposition from Tory backbenchers and some of the constituencies that the Conservatives gained in 2019, not to mention the competing EU trade deal. ‘Brexit’, Dearden writes, ‘is the prism through which Britain is experiencing the breakdown of neoliberal capitalism.’


Gabriel Feltan locates the roots of the movement that elected Jair Bolsonaro. ‘Driven by the redemptive promise of resolving Brazil’s social conflicts and ending its social differences’, the movement synthesises Evangelical, militaristic and Old Testament values into a new totalitarian formation that opposes ‘good citizens’ and ‘bandits’. Its ‘defining characteristic’, according to Feltan, ‘is aversion to difference’ and the urge to sweep away the degenerate old constitutional order for one driven by ‘masses who spout moral clichés and imbibe fake news, self-declared fighters of common enemies’.

This article is part of the 17/2020 Eurozine reviewClick here to subscribe to our weekly newsletter to get updates on reviews and our latest publishing.

Published 23 September 2020
Original in English
First published by Eurozine

© Eurozine


Published in

Share article


Subscribe to know what’s worth thinking about.

Related Articles

Cover for: Crown confidential

Britain’s royal family seeks to preserve the myth of the ‘neutral monarchy’ by blocking access to the archives. But as historians of the Commonwealth further investigate Britain’s colonial past, Buckingham Palace will not be able to maintain its tight control of the historical narrative.

Cover for: Crown confidential

Crown confidential

Index on Censorship 4/2022

How the British royal family seals the archives to preserve the myth of constitutional impartiality – and why the truth will out, if not in the courts then the Commonwealth.