Public media in Algeria
NAQD 37 (2020)
NAQD on the crisis of public sector journalism in Algeria: how disinformation and propaganda perpetuates the current system. Also: why reliance on advertising threatens public broadcasting, and the arrested development of print media.
Eurozine review 3/2020
New Humanist 2/2020
il Mulino 6/2019
NAQD 37 (2020)
Subscribe to the Eurozine Review and Newsletter!
Control is manifested in excessive coverage of mundane events designed to minimize the possibility of writing defamatory political pieces, he writes. There is also self-censorship (58 per cent of journalists said that they practise this regularly, knowing that their careers depend on it) and close surveillance of the kinds of information published (approximately half of all journalists have had their work heavily edited in order to conform politically). The manipulation of information and the use of propaganda ‘is making [the media] a key player in the perpetuation of the current political system and a status quo in terms of freedom of expression’. This is responsible for ‘the stunted development of the country’s sociopolitical consciousness’.
Nor El Houda Bouzegaou discusses the financing of Algerian public television through advertising, focusing on the public television company EPTV. Advertising is ‘susceptible to being destabilized, as it is dependent on the development of the market’, she argues; by relying on advertising, public television has come up against a number of economic challenges. Tracing the history of Algerian television, Bouzegaou shows how advertising can only develop fruitfully and fairly if it is carefully regulated.
Aldjia Bouchaala and Aissa Merah analyse the evolution of public media, particularly the print sector. ‘Thirty years after the application of a constitution on media pluralism and its reinforcement through a series of legal and institutional reforms, the media landscape remains unchanged’. Absence of oversight over legislation has been a major contributing factor. Bouchaala and Merah describe Algerian media as authoritarian and closed — ‘a natural extension of the country’s political regime’ — and argue that the rise in demagogy and populism in both private and public media has only aggravated this.
This article is part of the 3/2020 Eurozine review. Click here to subscribe to our reviews, and you also can subscribe to our newsletter and get the bi-weekly updates about the latest publications and news on partner journals.
This article was published in cooperation with CAIRN International Edition, translated and edited by Cadenza Academic Translations.
Published 27 February 2020
Original in English
First published by Eurozine
Since censorship in state socialist Poland was more lenient than in other countries of the Eastern Bloc, a peculiar counterpublicity was formed between samizdat, émigré publishing and western radio stations which amplified the voice of dissent.
Slapps – or strategic lawsuits against public participation – are a type of legal action undertaken not to be won but to intimidate defendants into silence or inaction. A report by Index on Censorship calls for measures, including an anti-Slapp directive, to be put in place to protect journalists from vexatious legal threats and actions.