As capital consolidates, culture recedes, funding vanishes, access narrows. The question persists: why fund culture at all? Cultural managers from Austria, Hungary and Serbia discuss.
This report provides the results of in-depth research into the European cultural journals sector that aimed to define and map cultural journals, their practices, motivations and the challenges in the field. The European cultural journals sector is highly diverse in terms of formats, style, and readership, and the journals cover a wide range of topics, whether literature, other types of arts, or political issues. Research has shown three important roles of cultural journals:
To date there has been no systematic study of the European cultural journals sector. The following research has been commissioned to fill this gap and represents a first step towards exploring the European cultural journals sector on a larger scale. The research provides insight into common characteristics of cultural journals through which the field can be demarcated, offers an overview of cultural journals in Europe, and shows their diversity in terms of subjects, styles, readership and more. The research was conducted with three aims in mind:
We have developed a multi-methodological approach and built a framework that allowed us to do justice to the diversity of the journals, emphasising their cultural specificity and context-dependence. Cultural journals can be defined as self-reflective community media and as context-specific niche publications that complement other media.
Our research identified three dimensions through which cultural journals can be distinguished from other media outlets: temporality; being experimental in style, often essayistic; depth of analysis. Here, we discuss our findings per dimension.
The diversity of cultural journals due to their context specificity also means that there is great variation in their distribution across Europe (See table 1 for an overview of the journals we found in our research). There are only few national studies and official statistics available about the number of cultural journals, so it is difficult to gauge the accuracy of our overview. Another reason for this is that, the European cultural journals sector is constantly changing, with journals appearing and disappearing in relatively short periods of time, making it difficult to capture it accurately. However, this first attempt of mapping cultural journals has identified almost 4,000 journals in Europe.

Our research has looked at the production, styles and audiences of cultural journals. Figures on this can be found in the full report. Here, we highlight some of the main findings from a survey among cultural journals with 480 respondents:
a) General characteristics:
b) Publication
c) Organisation and finances of cultural journals
d) Audiences of cultural journals
Our research outlines the specific role of cultural journals in the media landscape and society at large as providing analysis that is not caught up in the immediacy of current events, but is quicker and more accessible than academic publications, stressing their self-reflective nature. They provide in-depth, critical analysis and complementary perspectives on a regular basis. The data confirms the societal relevance and the functions that cultural journals fulfil in our societies, as they cater to a specific type of audience, which includes those working in fields of cultural and political influence, whether it is academia, education or the arts.
Our research identified a number of open questions and highlighted challenges that cultural journals are faced with. Further research would need to explore these areas with the aim to consider what are the main threats and opportunities for cultural journals to perform their vital societal role optimally. First, we have identified the importance of the context in which journals operate. Our data can be used in further analysis to make cross-national comparisons, identifying relevant geographic differences, most importantly to consider whether there are significant differences in the sustainability in certain areas. This may be particularly urgent in those places where cultural journals are compensating shortcomings and limitations of other media genres and where even more is at stake in terms of cultural issues in society.
Further research could also consider the dynamic nature of cultural journals that was identified by our research: Though cultural journals have a long history there are also many journals in our sample that have been established in the last few years. Future studies could determine whether this is due to vibrancy or precariousness in the field. Here we have indicated the very specific nature of cultural journals as expanding the media landscape, addressing specific audiences, experimenting with format and introducing alternative perspectives. Cultural journals provide an important space for reflection and support a critical and self-reflective public.
Corresponding author: Prof. dr. Tamara Witschge, t.a.c.witschge@rug.nl
Media Studies and Journalism, University of Groningen
This study has been commissioned by Eurozine as part of the project “Eurozine – Network of cultural journals”, which is co-funded by the Creative Europe programme of the European Union.
The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
Download the full study (you will be asked to provide anonymous information via a google form before downloading)
Published 1 November 2018
Original in English
First published by Eurozine
© Eurozine / Stefan Baack / Tamara Witschge / Tamilla Ziyatdinova / University of Groningen
PDF/PRINTSubscribe to know what’s worth thinking about.
As capital consolidates, culture recedes, funding vanishes, access narrows. The question persists: why fund culture at all? Cultural managers from Austria, Hungary and Serbia discuss.
springerin looks back on 30 years of art and cultural criticism: including Boris Buden on the benevolent westernizer; Yvonne Volkart on altered artistic landscapes; Süreyyya Evren on spaces of conflict; and Hans-Christian Dany on illusions of subjectivity.