- Eurozine Review
In ‘Esprit’, African intellectuals move beyond the post-colonial question. Including Jean Godefroy Bidima on the traumas of the African past: how self-reflection can avert a future explosion. Also: Souleymane Bachir Diagne on the restitution of African artifacts and a Bantu reimagining of the museum, and Bruno Latour on ‘geosocial class’.
In Esprit, African intellectuals move beyond the post-colonial question towards a new dialogue with Europe based on common humanity. Cameroonian philosopher Jean Godefroy Bidima traces how successive episodes of threat and opportunity, fear and euphoria have led to Africa’s precarious present. Past traumas explain much of the cultural and intellectual present, while maladministration by local elites persists and new intrusions from East and West threaten.
Bidima also highlights the continuing limitations imposed by ‘post-colonial’ discourses in Africa – its ‘symbolic debts’– and the way they ‘exhaust its dynamic young population before their race has started’. He likens Africa to a primed powder-keg, subject to internal and external forces ‘that inscribe and determine how tomorrow’s Africa will be’. To ‘cut the fuse’ in time will require reflection and self-reflection. Only then will Africa’s voice and ‘contribution to the human family’ be realized.
Restitution and re-imagination
Senegalese philosopher Souleymane Bachir Diagne focuses on the return of museum items to Africa: ‘their restitution to the continent of their birth raises questions about the meaning of a “return”’. He argues for the need to ‘reimagine the kinds of museums’ that might best host such items. Instead of ‘petrified’, ‘immobile’, ‘subjugated’ displays, he proposes an approach derived from Bantu cosmologies. The interplay of Islamic and African cultures – the design of mosques in particular – shows how future museums might express ‘a cosmology of continuing emergence’. Museums must reflect the mutability of their content, which embodies a ‘metamorphosis in progress’.
Ecology and pandemic
Bruno Latour identifies the inadequacies of current models of government in the face of health and ecological catastrophe. He makes the case for profound changes to civil society, state power and the relationship between them. Policy reactions to COVID-19 show the limitations of mere containment. If ecological disaster is to be prevented, habitability and sustainability must guide society. Latour argues for a new biopolitics and the notion of geosocial class in order to overcome political disengagement, revive the body politic and redirect our outlook.
This article was published in cooperation with CAIRN International Edition, translated and edited by Cadenza Academic Translations.
Published 26 August 2020
Original in English
First published by Eurozine
Contributed by Esprit © EurozinePDF/PRINT
How is the lexicon of war chosen? And can the target of this speech, the perpetual ‘other’ use those very words to their own emancipation?
The polemic intention of the ‘German catechism’ argument – that Holocaust memory serves a quasi-theological function and is therefore policed – has distracted from the empirical claims on which it rests. So how strong is the evidence of continuity between the colonial and the Nazi genocides? And does a direct connection need to be established in order to justify reconsideration of the ‘singularity theory’?