Political disenchantment in Belgium

La Revue Nouvelle 6 (2019)

‘La Revue Nouvelle’ analyses political disenchantment in Belgium: Social Democracy urgently needs to rethink as voter apathy aids rise of far-right Vlaams Belang; and as new ideological rifts pit productivity vs. ecology and nation vs. immigration.

According to a recent survey, only 35.6 per cent of the Belgian population has confidence in politicians, while 74 cent say the political system makes them feel powerless. ‘If the [major] political parties don’t want to find themselves side-lined,’ warns La Revue Nouvelle editor editor Renaud Maes, ‘then it is high time they had a radical rethink’.

Decline

The erosion of support for traditional political parties in the May 2019 Belgian elections cannot be solely attributed to the rise of far-right Flemish parties like Vlaams Belang, writes Michel Molitor. Large numbers of voters are either abstaining or casting blank ballots. ‘The historic power of socialist parties in Europe was inspired by a radical project that creates a space for the poor … [Their] decline today is a result of the disconnect between this underlying inspiration and their actions.’

Traditional parties can combat voter apathy only if they are able to define and convey their vision of the world with sufficient clarity to set them apart from political competitors. ‘There is no viable democracy or political life without clear polarization. In the context of contemporary uncertainty, adopting a clear position requires a strong dose of courage’.

Realignments

New ideological rifts dominated this election, ‘pitting economic interests against environmental interests’ (productivity/ecology) and nation versus immigration (identity/cosmopolitanism), write Robin Lebrun, Thomas Legein, and David Talukder. These rifts are embodied not by the traditional parties, but by two smaller ones: Écolo, Belgium’s French-speaking green party, and the liberal-conservative Mouvement Réformateur. As Christophe Mincke points out, ‘environmental concerns became predominant to the extent that almost the entire political spectrum claimed to address them’. This was a problem for Écolo, because it meant that other parties could claim parity with only a vaguely ‘eco-positive’ message.

Language

Laurence Rosier conducts a sociolinguistic analysis of campaign slogans during the elections. The predominance of action verbs, banal adverbs, and epithets from everyday speech represents an ‘impoverished semantics’ whose ideological vacuity expresses lack of faith in ‘the power of words to transform the world’.

This article is part of the 16/2019 Eurozine review. Click here to subscribe to our reviews, and you also can subscribe to our newsletter and get the bi-weekly updates about latest publications and news on partner journals.

More articles from La Revue Nouvelle in EurozineLa Revue Nouvelle’s website.

Published 13 September 2019
Original in English
First published by Eurozine

Contributed by La Nouvelle Revue © Eurozine / La Nouvelle Revue

PDF/PRINT

Related Articles

Cover for: Interference everywhere?

Interference everywhere?

Disinformation in the EP election

Although the Kremlin did try to interfere in European politics, focusing on Russia is misleading. Since some governments in the European Union are more interested in spreading fake news than stopping it, tackling disinformation cannot rely on them, Péter Krekó writes.

Cover for: Unaccountable Europe

Unaccountable Europe

How (un)democratic is the EU?

Democracy is being denied by the EU’s leaders. At fault are not ‘Brussels bureaucrats’ but the member states and their representatives. Lack of transparency makes legislation vulnerable to lobbying and enables national interests to be put before the European common good. Preventing Eurosceptic reaction means democratizing the European legislature.

Discussion