The truth about the electorate

Public Seminar 12+19 November 2020

Public Seminar blames the disappearance of local journalism for the over-dependency on polls. Also: why anti-racist literature may not signal a new conversation about race; and how schools remain arenas of exclusion in secular France.

Biden’s victory was not the decisive win that the Democrats had been assured. So why did the polling failures of 2016, that so underestimated Donald Trump’s influence with voters, persist into 2020? Claire Potter, historian and Public Seminar editor, canvassed for the Democrats and has some explanations.

The failure of polls to register the middle and largely unpolitical swathe of the electorate may be one reason for large swings for the Democrats. A second reason may be that the perceived stigma of supporting Trump – particularly among women and minorities – deters people from revealing their true preferences.

However, in order to explain why polls consistently mislead we need to look beyond polling methodology. The crisis in polling is happening at the same time that local journalism has been disappearing. Polls have become the sole indicator of what people think locally. But as Potter’s experience confirms, in 2020 it was local factors that were key understanding voter behaviour – and particularly the tendency to vote Republican lower down the ballot.

A new conversation about race?

Jeffrey Snyder argues that when black people film police violence against black people, they are standing in a long history of black testimony in the US – and resisting an equally long history of white people’s refusal to believe that testimony. ‘When she decided to record the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Darnella Frazier understood that without the footage, no one in authority would believe what she was seeing.’

Nineteenth-century slave narratives, the foundation of African American literature, were routinely prefaced by white abolitionists in order to attest to their authenticity. This phenomenon is now mirrored with the rise of anti-racist literature, which tends to come with obligatory ‘testimonials’ from black activists and scholars. ‘When Black witnesses render a verdict on the character of white authors, we are not necessarily seeing a new conversation about race, but a reversal of the power dynamic in which one group authorizes another to speak,’ writes Snyder.

A tale of two secularisms

Public schools in France have historically been central in propagating secular republicanism. However, writes Hannah Leffingwell, they also have a long history of discrimination. Geared towards producing exclusively male citizens, schools were also at the forefront of the ‘civilizing mission’ in the colonies.

It was only when colonial rule collapsed and citizens from the overseas departments began to make their way back to the metropole that laïcité was enshrined into the Fifth Republic. ‘Where Catholicism had once threatened France’s democratic project, Islam became a central target of fear and repression at the close of the twentieth century.’

Published 20 November 2020
Original in English
First published by Eurozine

© Eurozine

PDF/PRINT

Newsletter

Subscribe to know what’s worth thinking about.

Related Articles

Cover for: On the uses and disadvantages of historical comparisons for life

How can intense description of what is irreducibly particular help us to extract elements that are universal? Parallels between the child separations at the US–Mexico border and the experiences of Holocaust survivors prompt historian Marci Shore to ask what we can and cannot understand by thinking in comparisons with the past.

Cover for: Debating the f-word

Debating the f-word

Public Seminar 15 October 2020

Is it accurate historically to apply the term ‘fascism’ to America under Trump? And is to do so strategically astute? A special issue of ‘Public Seminar’ weighs in on the debate over the f-word. With contributions from Jan-Werner Müller, David Bell, Natasha Lennard and more.

Discussion