Prison isn’t working
The cover of the Samtiden shows a heavy steel door and the words ‘Does prison work?’ The contributors – jurists, philosophers and social scientists – generally answer that question in the negative. Asked to define which single change to the current system they would prioritize, most favour gentler punishments with emphasis on rehabilitation in a humane setting. Not for sex crimes though.
Eurozine review 1/2020
Ord & Bild 5/2019
Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 120 (2019)
Syn og Segn 4/2019
Philosopher David C. Vogt has investigated the justice of the sentencing range of prison terms and possible alternatives to prison, notably forms of ‘restorative justice’, for example, facilitated encounters between perpetrator and victim. Vogt sees this as an application of ‘Hegel’s concept of recognition of personal autonomy’ and stresses the current elements of unfairness of the court-based system, with its social and racial biases. He argues that ‘the Hegelian perspective points to a new direction for criminal law [so that] punishments are not designed to hurt and are replaced by alternative sanctions based on communication [and] recognition of equal values of people.’
Andreas Ribe graduated in philosophy while serving a prison sentence for murder (in self-defence) and later completed a doctoral thesis on ‘imprisonment and punishment’. He proposes ‘that all convicts start their sentences in open prisons, and that closed prisons are reserved for those convicted of major and repeated breaches of the prison regulations.’
In a closed institution, ‘the prisoner’s dominant experience is suffering, which is regarded as expiation. Whatever the roles played by the guard and the prisoner, the relationship always entails the prisoner submitting.’ The individual prisoner can only come to terms with herself or himself when the oppressive demands of the ‘security culture’ are seen as secondary to personal development.
These themes recur in the heated exchange between Anders Løvlie, who castigates the lack of ‘an overarching application of humanistic ideology’ in criminal law, and Ragnar Kristoffersen, who rejects this as simplistic, given the variability of the nature of crimes as well as of prison populations
Sympathy for the criminal is less evident in the social geographer Anne Bitsch’s analysis of legal handling of sexual violence against women, especially rape. She wants ‘the focus to be on the acts of the perpetrator and not on what the victim might have said or done’.
This article is part of the 1/2020 Eurozine review. Click here to subscribe to our reviews, and you also can subscribe to our newsletter and get the bi-weekly updates about the latest publications and news on partner journals.
Published 25 January 2020
Original in English
First published by Eurozine
An interview with Andreas Voßkuhle
Critics of the German Federal Constitutional Court’s controversial ECB ruling in May 2020 claimed it had hindered EU integration and undermined rule of law. But although the ruling was applauded by Eurosceptics, it was anything but anti-European, argues the Court’s former president.
It may seem utopian, but granting rights to inanimate beings could break the institutional deadlocks of environmental policy making. Not only that, ‘a parliament of things’ could eliminate the inequalities inherent in our anthropocentric approach to politics.