Learning to live with the madness

Distrust in authority is the fundamental reason for low vaccination rates across eastern Europe. But we shouldn’t think of anti-science as the expression of mere ignorance, nor primarily as a grass-roots movement.

Rejecting science is not so much a grass-roots movement, says Péter Krekó, in conversation with Réka Kinga Papp, as it is a position based on political affiliation. While acknowledging that the excessive mystification of scholarly knowledge and the natural sciences can harm the democratization of these fields, Krekó argues that tackling anti-science requires investigation too. Perhaps disinformation and junk science cannot be eradicated, but critical skills can help navigate an accelerated digital media environment.

This episode of Gagarin is also available as an extended version with bonus material for Eurozine patrons. In the full conversation, we look into what effect vaccine debates will have on the upcoming Hungarian elections, and whether there is an antidote to junk science and bogus commercial undertakings.

Click to access the bonus material with Péter Krekó on Patreon. Photo by tiburi on Pixabay.

Péter Krekó is director of the Budapest-based think tank Political Capital Institute, Hungary. He is also a former Europe’s Futures Fellow of Eurozine’s long-time collaborator, the Institute for Human Sciences, Vienna. He has written extensively for Eurozine on conspiracy theories and disinformation, and their implications for the pandemic.

Find Péter Krekó’s latest article, ‘Mutations of science in the pandemic in Eurozine, along with his previous articles dealing with disinformation, social psychology and more.

Please subscribe to the podcast and leave a review so more people can find us. You can also subscribe to our newsletter, so you’ll always know what’s worth thinking about.

Published 11 February 2022
Original in English

Newsletter

Subscribe to know what’s worth thinking about.

Related Articles

Cover for: In defence of the objective world

Postmodern ideas have gained the status of absolute truths. Relativism, selectively appropriated into the language of both left and right politics, has metamorphosed into dogma. As oversimplification distorts communication, public trust in scientific fact has eroded. Could renewed ideas of objectivity be a way out?

Cover for: Lying eyes

Lying eyes

Can facial expressions ascertain truth in court?

Reading faces has no place in law books. Yet the assessment of appearance and demeanour, largely unspoken, still plays a role in ascertaining truth in court. Unscientific and obscure, this practice can lead to discrimination targeting specific ethnic groups.

Discussion