How to argue better

New Humanist 4/2019

New Humanist’s winter issue, the last under the helm of editor Daniel Trilling, asks how we can improve not only the topics we discuss, but also how we discuss them.


Eleanor Gordon-Smith asks what happens to us when we change our minds and the stakes are high. We assume, she argues, that rationality is only ever about abandoning emotion and personal reflection: ‘The idea seems to be’, she observes, ‘that being emotional precludes being rational, and we can only select one way of being at a time’. This assumes that rationality is all about how we hook up our behaviour to our goals, ignoring the vital question of which goals are worth pursuing. The way around this is to think about real stories where people have changed their minds.


Madeline Roache looks at 2019 documentary Tell No One, which shows confrontations between sexually abusive priests and their victims. Writer Michal Wojchiechowicz, for example, kept quiet for years because figures like accused priest Henryk Jankowski played a significant role in the Solidarity movement, often hiding dissidents. ‘I couldn’t speak about it’, says Wojchiechowicz, ‘because fighting communism was more important’. The Law and Justice Party, portraying itself as a ‘defender of Christendom’, has forged an alliance with Polish bishops, replacing sex education in schools with ‘Preparation for Family Life’ programs, restricting the availability of the morning-after pill, and conflating the LGBT community with the paedophiles they claimed to be clamping down on.

Uzbek perestroika?

After the death of Islam Karimov, whose regime in post-Soviet Uzbekistan was widely considered one of the world’s most repressive, the government of Shavkat Mirziyoyev has introduced reforms dubbed the ‘Uzbek Spring’. They include reducing the power of the state security service, releasing political prisoners, abolishing forced labour and scrapping visa requirements for citizens of most European countries. But ‘the government still has little respect for the rights of ordinary Uzbeks’, Marc Bennetts reports. Demolitions and heavy-handed ‘urban renovation projects’, carried out by companies with ties to the government, bulldoze residential areas to build business centres and pose a threat to UNESCO world heritage sites like the ancient Silk Road cities of Bukhara and Samarkand.


Achille Mbembe’s powerful take on the ‘carceral geography’ of technologically-enhanced borders, set to become the ‘defining conflict of our time’ (first published in Esprit in French and in English translation in Eurozine).

More articles from New Humanist in Eurozine; New Humanist’s website

This article is part of the 20/2019 Eurozine review. Click here to subscribe to our reviews, and you also can subscribe to our newsletter and get the bi-weekly updates about the latest publications and news on partner journals.

Published 29 November 2019
Original in English
First published by Eurozine

© Eurozine


Related Articles

Cover for: Friction and the aesthetics of the smooth

Friction and the aesthetics of the smooth

Ethics in times of dataism

Seamless design is an important dogma of dataism. Without unpredictable behaviour, however, there’s no data to retrieve. A wholly predictable future is just a continuous present, a tyranny of choices on offer.

Cover for: Exploring group sociology

Exploring group sociology

Mittelweg 36 1/2020

When a group experiment carried out by the Frankfurt School in the 1950s revealed Holocaust denialism, it was rejected on methodological grounds, writes historian Johannes Platz in ‘Mittelweg 36’. It was not until the 1960s that the concept of the group became central to ‘the formatting of the social’.